From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9e927c332cabaf8f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Loss of Mars Climate Orbiter due to units of measurment conflicts Date: 1999/10/21 Message-ID: <7uo03r$ltt$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 538881835 References: <7t9tvd$9h3$1@netserv.univ-lille1.fr> <1999Oct4.072511.1@eisner> <2A02C30D72C8E6B4.DFCF46BA85758C97.B51FFEB632AE496F@lp.airnews.net> <38062935.F35CF3F1@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> <380F272A.988B7524@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x25.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Oct 21 21:21:03 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-10-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Ehud Lamm wrote: > It seems we are sometimes too eager to find arguments where none really > exists (like variable names vs. comments, which I really assume we all > agree are both useful. Of course we all agree that both are useful, but that is not what the discussion is about, and there is indeed some disagreement here, the disussion is real, reread carefully :-) The issue is whether names can stand in for comments.... Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.