From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,eda443e5aaf028c4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Suprise of comparison result
Date: 1999/10/18
Message-ID: <7ue08n$o3k$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 537271481
References: <37fd7e17.0@news.pacifier.com> <wccr9j5nat8.fsf@world.std.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x23.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Oct 18 02:22:22 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-10-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <wccr9j5nat8.fsf@world.std.com>,
  Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com> wrote:
> Ada's modular types really are at the C level.  Don't use them
> if you don't want to program at that level.

I disagree, they have a well defined abstract semantics that
is nothing to do with level. If you understand these semantics
there is no reason to avoid them, and this has nothing to do
with being at the C "level".


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.