From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a79e3b493c2ba811
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>
Subject: Re: Interrupt Handlers using GNAT-VxWorks?
Date: 1999/10/18
Message-ID: <7udtnm$mco$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 537271245
References: <7u500m$e96@niven.ksc.nasa.gov>
 <38076AEB.11FA6168@cityfujisawa.ne.jp>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x23.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Oct 18 01:39:02 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-10-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <38076AEB.11FA6168@cityfujisawa.ne.jp>,
  toots@kama.melco.co.jp wrote:
>
> As you may know, GNAT limits "Ada Interrupts" only to
> "signals" probably because of portability, although that
> feature could be an obtacle for those who write codes using
> many user defined vectors.


Actually there is no fundamental reason for this limitation.
If you need to handle interrupts directly and you are using
GNATWorks, please contact report@gnat.com to discuss your
requirements.

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.