From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,391464232b8157e2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC compatability.
Date: 1999/09/30
Message-ID: <7supva$9t6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 530989159
References: <gR3I3.185$hs.12299@monger.newsread.com>
 <m3ogenkthv.fsf@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <87n1u6khco.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org> <x7vr9jii9jm.fsf@pogner.moho>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x34.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Sep 30 04:46:37 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-09-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <x7vr9jii9jm.fsf@pogner.moho>,
  Simon Wright <simon@pogner.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> The (admittedly minimal) C++ code I've built
> with such a beast has
> given me no problems.
>
> Just one (rather vague) datum, of course!


No one said that it would be completely inoperative. The errors
which are undoubtedly there are likely to be quite subtle. The
point is that our patches have not been tested on G++, and in
any case there are known weaknesses in 2.8.1 (unpatched) wrt g++


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.