From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,81cf52699486abe7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "David Botton" <David@Botton.com>
Subject: Re: Code size of Ada ? was Re: Ada95 Strengths/Weaknesses.
Date: 1999/09/28
Message-ID: <7srobr$2td0$1@news.gate.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 530524945
References: <37EED7B8.245C0054@yukyonline.co.yuky>
 <7smp30$9aa1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <7sp8m9$a6e$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <37F0D03C.DE4807D4@icn.siemens.de>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700
X-Complaints-To: abuse@gate.net
X-Trace: news.gate.net 938566843 95648 199.227.189.246 (29 Sep 1999 01:00:43
 GMT)
Organization: CyberGate, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Sep 1999 01:00:43 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-09-29T01:00:43+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

try adding

-largs -s

David Botton

Alfred Hilscher wrote in message <37F0D03C.DE4807D4@icn.siemens.de>...
>Ok, so can you please tell me what I'm doing wrong ? All my test (from a
>simple "Hello world" upto a TCP/IP program with tasks) generate much
>bigger exe-files (WIN/NT or OS/2) than the C, Pascal or Modula-2
>compilers I've tried. I used the default settings. What switches are
>needed to generate the smallest possible code ?
>
>Regards,
>Alfred