From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1f2c919699634e6c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: adahome consultant index Date: 1999/09/29 Message-ID: <7srnpa$3ae$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 530347357 References: <7snvdo$cch$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7spb2s$31os$1@news.gate.net> <7sqrqq$e7t$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7sr6v8$n0r$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x43.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Sep 29 00:50:55 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-09-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7sr6v8$n0r$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, David Botton wrote: > Is there some sort of official process for doing this? Of course not! There is nothing official about Magnus' page, or the FAQ there. So how could there be an official process for declaring this FAQ unofficial, when it was never official in the first place. Go ahead and make your own FAQ, let the free market place of ideas decide whether it is useful (I am sure it will be :-) > > Unfortunately, Magnus has the old FAQ copyrighted with a > > rather restrictive license. > > I am well aware of the license. Even code examples on AdaHome > have very restrictive licenses. > > If I do take it over, I do not intend on using the old FAQ as > a base. The licensing will probably be GPL or the like. Any > suggestions? The GPL seems a reasonable choice, basically I think any free software compatible license is acceptable in this context, but I prefer to avoid restrictive licenses. I believe Magnus even tried to copyright the HTML version of the RM he prepared (though that was a very dubious attempt given the original copyright statement from Intermetrics). Of course all creators are permitted by law to take whatever advantages they can of the intellectual property laws, but obviously from the point of the Ada community, it is desirable if as much of the technology as possible is freely available. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.