From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,81cf52699486abe7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: GNAT listing file default names (was: Ada95 Strengths/Weaknesses) Date: 1999/09/29 Message-ID: <7srmd7$2dr$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 530338056 References: <37EED7B8.245C0054@yukyonline.co.yuky> <7smp30$9aa1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <7sp8m9$a6e$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <1999Sep28.074901.1@eisner> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x43.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Sep 29 00:27:30 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-09-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <1999Sep28.074901.1@eisner>, Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam wrote: > and the major benefit I see from that is you can use the same > convention for two listing files that share a directory and > both can have the standard listing extension: > > MYPACKAGE_.LIS MYPACKAGE.LIS > > So how do the listing files get named by default in GNAT ? Voice from the past? :-) Actually no, a voice from the VMS present :-) Listing file? what's that? Seriously, like most modern compilers GNAT does not provide an old style listing file. You can if you like ask for complete listing output, but this is generated to standard output, and is redirected as required (unlike the situation in VMS, redirection of this kind is very simple in Unix and DOS-like systems). So this simply is not an issue ... Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.