From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bd40601768eaf8fd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: "Competence" (was: 'constant functions' and access constant params) Date: 1999/09/28 Message-ID: <7sr7tq$nsk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 530239572 References: <7r5vh3$imu1@svlss.lmms.lmco.com> <37d6a45c@news1.prserv.net> <37d6ccb6@news1.prserv.net> <7r77i8$i08$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37d7c116@news1.prserv.net> <7r8t21$ov5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37d822a1@news1.prserv.net> <7reg02$t83@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> <37DE8D09.C863CBC9@rational.com> <7roohh$s6r@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> <37e01168@news1.prserv.net> <7rp86o$c6h@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <37E18CC6.C8D431B@rational.com> <7rs8bn$s6@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> <37e2e58c@news1.prserv.net> <7s9nd0$cbe@dfw-ixnews17.ix.netcom.com> <37e8e067@news1.prserv.net> <7sas3p$bfa@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <7sc6b6$c6m$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7socka$6u4@dfw-ixnews19.ix.netcom.com> <7sqc54$1va$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7sqp4i$c5a$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x29.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Sep 28 20:20:23 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-09-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7sqp4i$c5a$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Ted Dennison wrote: > In article <7sqc54$1va$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, > Robert Dewar wrote: > > in documentation are serious bugs, and competent programmers > ... > > Then it is being modified by incompetent people. yes, I I find your reaction to the use of the word competent odd. Are there programming shops where lack of competence is considered desirable? Are there programming shops where failure to update documentation to match code changes is considered to be desirable, or to be a sign of competence? I would think the answer to both questions would be no, but you never know, we read some strange things on CLA :-) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.