From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1f2c919699634e6c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "David Botton" Subject: Re: adahome consultant index Date: 1999/09/27 Message-ID: <7spb2s$31os$1@news.gate.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 530134809 References: <7snvdo$cch$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Complaints-To: abuse@gate.net X-Trace: news.gate.net 938487708 100124 199.227.148.123 (28 Sep 1999 03:01:48 GMT) Organization: CyberGate, Inc. NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Sep 1999 03:01:48 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-09-28T03:01:48+00:00 List-Id: Is this a needed resource for the Ada community? If I added it to AdaPower, would this be "stepping" on the toes of AdaHome in particular since I see no reason to not extend my free policy to such a resource? I have tried to avoid duplicating efforts on AdaHome such as the Ada FAQs and other resources found there. I sent off a message many months ago, that I never received a reponce to, asking to take over maintenance of the Ada FAQ, but never heard back. What are the feelings on my adding such resources to AdaPower? David Botton Pat Rogers wrote in message ... >Joe Wisniewski wrote in message >news:7snvdo$cch$1@nnrp1.deja.com... >> I was just curious whether www.adahome.com/Market/condex is getting >> "enough" action for those that have paid for the spot. I'm curious >> because I see that, if the "last updated" date is accurate, then >> the page has not been updated in about a year and a half, which may >> or may not be meaningful. >> >> Just curious about the volume of hits AND whether those involved >> feel it is a good investment. > >Many, many months ago I sent the necessary check to Magnus to sign up >for that. Nothing ever happened and I got no reply from Magnus about >whether the list (or the site, for that matter) is active. So it looks >like those that signed up initially got a great deal (since I doubt >they've had to pay since)! > >