From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c63aa81a67eceb8f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Ragged Array Proposal
Date: 1999/09/25
Message-ID: <7sijop$tab$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 529392928
References: <37e7c08e@eeyore.callnetuk.com> <37EA9A72.594ED8F5@mitre.org>
 <37ebb120@eeyore.callnetuk.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x40.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Sep 25 13:47:07 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-09-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <37ebb120@eeyore.callnetuk.com>,
  "Nick Roberts" <nickroberts@callnetuk.com> wrote:
> Using Ada.Strings.Unbounded is one of the unappealing
alternatives I was
> talking about.


The trouble with this thread is that it is just replaying an
old discussion with little new being added on both sides. I
guess that is somewhat inevitable as new people begin to think
about things, often without digging through the past :-)

Nick, you might want to dig up some of the old discussions
and proposals on ragged arrays ...


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.