From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c63aa81a67eceb8f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Ragged Array Proposal Date: 1999/09/24 Message-ID: <7sem7l$60m$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 528703033 References: <37e7c08e@eeyore.callnetuk.com> <7satei$e2q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37EA4E91.1D4D1FC@averstar.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x22.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Sep 24 02:04:42 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-09-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <37EA4E91.1D4D1FC@averstar.com>, Tucker Taft wrote: I know at least that the > Aonix and Green Hills Ada 95 compilers statically allocate and initialize > allocators for access-to-constant types. I haven't checked GNAT. Yes, GNAT does the same optimization, it is after all trivial. It is interesting to note that the original form with allocators could also be optimized. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.