From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c63aa81a67eceb8f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Ragged Array Proposal
Date: 1999/09/24
Message-ID: <7sem41$600$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 528703013
References: <37e7c08e@eeyore.callnetuk.com> <7satei$e2q$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <m3vh922o3u.fsf@vault80.infomatch.bc.ca>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x22.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Sep 24 02:02:46 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-09-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <m3vh922o3u.fsf@vault80.infomatch.bc.ca>,
> The problem with this approach is that the data is duplicated.

It is both in
> the static data area of the program (i.e. the string

constants), and in the
> heap.

The right way to write this is using 'Access on constant
strings, and then the data will not be duplicated. Of course
a compiler might optimize the above case anyway.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.