From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bd40601768eaf8fd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Array of Variant Records Question... Date: 1999/09/14 Message-ID: <7rlcfv$csi$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 524820501 References: <7r5vh3$imu1@svlss.lmms.lmco.com> <37d6a45c@news1.prserv.net> <37d6ccb6@news1.prserv.net> <7r77i8$i08$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37d7c116@news1.prserv.net> <7r8t21$ov5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37dcf193@news1.prserv.net> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x37.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Sep 14 11:45:05 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-09-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Brian Rogoff wrote: > I'd really like to reconsider this entire idea of what is better for > the reader and maintainer of code, since it is by no means clear that > there is widespread consensus on what is more readable. Here is another > example where being explicit is considered by some to be an impediment to > readability. You don't really want to reconsider the "entire idea", you just want to discuss in a particular case what really does help or not help readability. There is never unanimous agreement in this area (consider for example the case of use clauses), but the principle is an important one. There is no rule that says making things explicit always helps readability! Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.