From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2beee871357c199d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dkristol@see-my.sig (David Kristola) Subject: ada-mode (was Re: need editor) Date: 1999/09/14 Message-ID: <7rk53d$iog1@svlss.lmms.lmco.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 524700907 Distribution: world References: <7rc1e1$6ku@hobbes.crc.com> Organization: heaps of stacks Reply-To: dkristol@see-my.sig Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-09-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article 6ku@hobbes.crc.com, "David C. Hoos, Sr." () writes: {snip} >The latest Ada-mode for Emacs (platform-independent) is available >from http://ada.eu.org/ada-mode/ > >So, given that for context, Robert is absolutely correct -- to >take advantage of the features in the Ada-mode under discussion -- >GNAT _is_ required. > >> Rational's Apex provides an emacs/ada-mode combination with >> similar functionality. It looks like they modified emacs 19.30 >> and an older ada-mode to work somewhat seemlessly with the rest >> of the Apex tools. There are a few quirks, but I find it much, >> much nicer than the standard Apex editor. I especially like >> the "Show Usage" function. Would there be a way to make an ada-mode that could work in either environment? I have my own ada-mode which has evolved over the years and periodically incorporated some of the features of the official ada-mode. It uses the file names to figure out if it is working with Verdix (*.a), Apex (*.[12].ada), or GNAT (*.ad[sb]) ada files. I really need to isolate a few features of my ada-mode and put them in an enhancement package, then go with the official version. --djk, keeper of arcane lore & trivial fluff Home: David95037 at aol dot com Spam: goto.hades@welovespam.com