From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,24ac4e1c8cbfe3c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: histrionics Date: 1999/09/13 Message-ID: <7rj3qi$nsi$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 524460678 References: <37D670CE.855F96BD@interact.net.au> <37D678E4.9867000B@interact.net.au> <37d74de9@eeyore.callnetuk.com> <7r8c60$b2q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7r9rkj$g75$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7rb5lm$dhu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x29.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Sep 13 15:04:59 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-09-13T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , b-collins@home.com (Bob Collins) wrote: > in discussions about Prolog, both if-then expert system > rules and parser rewrite rules are variants of Post > Production Systems. One of my doctoral students wrote a > thesis that used LR parsing as the inference engine for > an expert system. He combined an earlier idea about using ... > lab). The AI journal he submitted the work to did not publish > his results (I think) because they did not understand LR > parsing and the PL journal he submitted was not interested in > the AI implications. Cool! It didn't seem possible that I'd be the only person to ever think of that. Is there anywhere I can get a look at it? Or did he not publish his work on the web either? -- T.E.D. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.