Re: Help needed: Access type to functions in generic package

[zeiram@deathsdoor.com]

In article <37dc1a3f@news1.prserv.net>,
  "Matthew Heaney" <matthew_heaney@acm.org> wrote:
> In article <37DBFEBF.B74D1958@deathsdoor.com> , Zeiram
> <zeiram@deathsdoor.com>  wrote:
>
> > This is due
> > to the fact that I also need to realize a dynamic implementation
> > of my software (yes, this a project from my CS course :-) )
>
> I don't know what you mean by "realize a dynamic implementation."
>
By "dynamic implementation", I meant a definition of my maze with
access types to the components of my maze. A bit "a la" sparse
matrix. With that, the memory space is allocated only when a new
corridor is created at run time.

Opposed to this is a "static implementation" where the needed memory
space is allocated at compile time, hence using a maximum memory.

I'm not sure these terms are correct in English, they are a direct
translation from the terms we use in French. Does these definitions
help you understand what I wanted with my code?

> Does the private type above meet your needs?  If not, why not?
>
It will meet my needs, but only because we reduced our needs.
Part of the definition of our project was to extend our
maze to a Nth dimension space, not just 3 dim... If we still
had to do it in a larger dimensional space, I think this solution
would be difficult to use.

Anyway, thanks a lot for your help.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.