From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,836e43045b715f57 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Package reformatting tool availability Date: 1999/09/13 Message-ID: <7rhlg8$nn7$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 524270125 References: <37CFFA58.FFC67480@res.raytheon.com> <7qpeg1$2di$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37D542F9.3C6C9F4D@res.raytheon.com> <7ree14$t3h@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x27.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Sep 13 01:54:20 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-09-13T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7ree14$t3h@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>, Richard D Riehle wrote: > Yikes!!!!!! Fifty types per package? Therein lies a uparalleled > opportunity for keeping maintenance programmers secure in their jobs > for a very long time. Hmmm! I don't like even *suggesting* that a simple numeric criterion is appropriate. Two is too many if the types are unrelated and would be better off in separate packages. Fifty or more may be fine if they are somehow a coherent set of related types. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.