From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Package reformatting tool availability
Date: 1999/09/13
Date: 1999-09-13T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7rhlg8$nn7$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7ree14$t3h@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com
In article <7ree14$t3h@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>,
Richard D Riehle <laoXhai@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Yikes!!!!!! Fifty types per package? Therein lies a
uparalleled
> opportunity for keeping maintenance programmers secure in
their jobs
> for a very long time.
Hmmm! I don't like even *suggesting* that a simple numeric
criterion is appropriate.
Two is too many if the types are unrelated and would be better
off in separate packages.
Fifty or more may be fine if they are somehow a coherent set of
related types.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-09-13 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-09-03 0:00 Package reformatting tool availability Andy Askey
1999-09-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-09-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-09-07 0:00 ` Andy Askey
1999-09-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-09-11 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-09-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1999-09-14 0:00 ` Mark Lundquist
1999-09-06 0:00 ` Pierre Dissaux
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox