From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,24ac4e1c8cbfe3c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: histrionics Date: 1999/09/13 Message-ID: <7rhl62$nd5$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 524267482 References: <37D670CE.855F96BD@interact.net.au> <37D678E4.9867000B@interact.net.au> <37d74de9@eeyore.callnetuk.com> <7r8c60$b2q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7r9rkj$g75$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7rcckp$b12$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x27.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Sep 13 01:48:54 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-09-13T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , "Vladimir Olensky" wrote: > I had this in mind when was talking about backtracking. > In Prolog cut operator significantly complicates > comprehending of the backtracking process. OK, so we are in complete agreement here. Unfortunately, large real world Prolog programs tend to depend heavily on cut. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.