From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8f7a197ad3ba9281
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Ada takes control.../Ada OS
Date: 1999/09/11
Message-ID: <7rcc9b$amk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 523593203
References: <7r9gst$274o$1@news.gate.net> <7rb4g6$cj6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7rb94q$30dk$1@news.gate.net> <7rbtm3$hu$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <37d98df8@eeyore.callnetuk.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x43.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Sep 11 01:46:22 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-09-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <37d98df8@eeyore.callnetuk.com>,
  "Nick Roberts" <nickroberts@callnetuk.com> wrote:
> With respect, I think we can do a lot better than an Ada
version of Linux,
> although it might be a good stepping stone.
>
> I'm currently working on the basic design of an OS that'll be
significantly
> superior (more modular, better designed, more efficient,
object oriented,
> proper security, NATO PCTE compatible, etc.) and as soon as I
get the time
> (I'm nearly done with the overview) I'll be putting details on
the AdaPower
> site (Labs/OS in Ada).

Is this before or after you complete work on your wonderful
full language optimizing Ada compiler? :-)


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.