From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bd40601768eaf8fd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mcc@entropy.cs.princeton.edu (Martin C. Carlisle)
Subject: Re: Array of Variant Records Question...
Date: 1999/09/08
Message-ID: <7r66fl$ocg$1@cnn.Princeton.EDU>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 522611553
References: <7r5vh3$imu1@svlss.lmms.lmco.com>
Organization: US Air Force Academy, Dept of Computer Science
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-09-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7r5vh3$imu1@svlss.lmms.lmco.com>,
Bruce Detter <bruce.detter@lmco.com> wrote:
>How do you declare an array of variant records where each variant record's
>descriminant is the array index?  Can it be done at all?  I would prefer not
>to use access pointers if it can be avoided.

If this is all you need, why not just make regular records, where a field
is the array index?

--Martin

-- 
Martin C. Carlisle, Asst Prof of Computer Science, US Air Force Academy
carlislem@acm.org, http://www.usafa.af.mil/dfcs/bios/carlisle.html
DISCLAIMER:  This content in no way reflects the opinions, standards or 
policy of the US Air Force Academy or the United States Government.