From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ebf0c2e0d9df034 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Ada95 + FORTRAN 77 Date: 1999/09/08 Message-ID: <7r4f4t$h03$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 522324331 References: <7r07rr$gap$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7r0u2o$vik$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7r2hkn$3cb$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x28.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Sep 08 01:46:08 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-09-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7r2hkn$3cb$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, okellogg@my-deja.com wrote: > In article <7r0u2o$vik$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, > Robert Dewar wrote: > > [...] At the same time, we also > > implemented a rather nice feature: > > > > type C_Bool is new Boolean; > > pragma Convention (C, C_Bool); > > > > Hey, that's nifty. How about suggesting this for standardization > in Ada-0x ? Ada-0X is nothing more than a possibility right now. Far more relevant at this stage is to recommend things to the ARG for possible semi-standarization as recommended extensions, and I will be happy to send this one along :-) Robert Dewar Ada Core Technologies Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.