From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,88e7ef9008757431 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Function Calls by Address Date: 1999/09/03 Message-ID: <7qooh7$hbh$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 520608460 References: <37CADE68.6AF06F5D@escmail.orl.lmco.com> <37CEEFFA.7D73F78D@magic.fr> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x43.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Sep 03 15:12:51 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-09-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <37CEEFFA.7D73F78D@magic.fr>, Francois Godme wrote: > Loop around a small C language stub that calls a function > passed from Ada. > > Easy, next one :) > > Francois Godme Not so fast! I assume you mean to use 'Address here. This may work on some implementations, but there is no guarantee that it will work, and it definitely will NOT work on some implementations where the Address of a procedure is not a full context, and it typically will NOT work for nested procedures with uplevel references. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.