From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a24b018d93ac1bc6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Ada 83 pretty printers Date: 1999/09/03 Message-ID: <7qn4gc$ctl$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 520351695 References: X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x32.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Sep 03 00:24:53 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-09-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Tony Vincent wrote: > Gnat is not available due to restrictions on the source of > executables on our secure network. I am curious. I certainly see that you would not download the public version of GNAT, and we don't recommend that anyone do this for any mission critical project, let alone one that is in a secure network environment, since indeed downloading from public sites is a risk, you have no way of knowing what is there for sure. However, I fail to see why any distinction should be drawn between DEC Ada, a commercial product of Compaq, and GNAT Professional, a commercial product of Ada Core Technologies. Indeed the fact that you can actually see what is in the sources of GNAT should give you *more* confidence that there is nothing potentially damaging. Robert Dewar Ada Core Technologies Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.