From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,288d9a25b0a9af53
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault on VADSself
Date: 1999/08/30
Message-ID: <7qf2vo$gek$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 519023140
References: <7qer2f$j2a$1@mars.worldonline.fr>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x33.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 32.101.128.216
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Aug 30 23:09:53 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-08-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7qer2f$j2a$1@mars.worldonline.fr>,
  "FAVIER PIERRE" <pierre.favier@worldonline.fr> wrote:
> Any clue on how to solve this?

Does the vendor say the compiler should work with the later
OS version? If not, then no reason to think it will. If so,
then I would say let the vendor sort out the problem!
Generally you cannot assume version X of a compiler that works
on version Y of an OS will work on version Y+1 of the OS,
even if upwards compatibility is promised by the OS vendor.

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.