From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7e3f2390630f30a3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "David C. Hoos, Sr." <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com>
Subject: Re: URGENT: year 2000 compliance
Date: 1999/08/30
Message-ID: <7qdu98$lsq@hobbes.crc.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 518856576
References: <935487077.548895@dedale.pandemonium.fr>
 <7ptt39$c4o@hobbes.crc.com> <7qamjs$g88$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Organization: Coleman Research Corporation
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-08-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com> wrote in message
news:7qamjs$g88$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> In article <7ptt39$c4o@hobbes.crc.com>,
>   "David C. Hoos, Sr." <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com> wrote:
> >
> > =:-) Vincent <vincent.brosseau@bruker.fr> wrote in message
> > news:935487077.548895@dedale.pandemonium.fr...
> > > Does anybody know if GNAT 3.10p is Y2K compliant ?
> > >
> > According to the gnat website (http://www.gnat.com), it is.
>
>
> No, that is incorrect. The statement on the web site is a formal
> compliance statement that refers ONLY to the supported
> GNAT Professional version.
>
I'm sorry I misunderstood.  I was referring to the big yellow
splash that says "Year 2000 Compliant."  It was neither clear to
me that this refers only to GNAT Professional, nor that is
"a formal statement."

Again, I'm sorry if I misled anyone.