From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,63167ef9334693ba
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!newsreader1.level3.com!newsfeed1.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Draft of Changes To Ada Tasking Model
Date: 13 Jun 2005 07:22:32 -0500
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <7q+49EjLZEgq@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <1118651520.148753.151880@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <1118663494.388572.122790@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1118665334 10389 192.135.80.34 (13 Jun 2005
 12:22:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:22:14 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11320
Date: 2005-06-13T07:22:32-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1118663494.388572.122790@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>, mp2sleep@hotmail.com writes:
> Please, guys, this not an ego-trip or something. I dont intend to
> attach
> my name to the document, no copyrights no narcissism on my part.
> 
> If there is any Ada Standardization body that allows docs to be viewed
> by outsiders, then its ok for me.

I believe what people are trying to hint is that the Ada Standards
people are accustomed to receiving proposals that have already had
some peer review, such as in this newsgroup.

> You can decide to rip it apart or like it. Your choice.