From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b4846bde7eaac045 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: gnat on linux (strange problems and behaviour) Date: 1999/08/21 Message-ID: <7pmmsv$ro4$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 515525332 References: <37B0B4CB.E15ECC72@billybob.demon.co.uk> <37B3D56F.AB39C948@billybob.demon.co.uk> <87pv0sm30x.fsf@antinea.enst.fr> <37BEA492.413D9707@ebox.tninet.se> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x36.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 166.72.82.184 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Aug 21 17:16:20 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-08-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <37BEA492.413D9707@ebox.tninet.se>, Stefan Skoglund wrote: > a software package should never require . in the PATH. > This is most definitely broken !!! > > Consider the existence of trojans. Sorry I do not see what you are talking about. As Sam said, if you have a single user machine on which you control all software on the machine, and no one else uses it, then putting . in your path is not a problem. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.