From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,10444cff97404845 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: C like op= proposal Date: 1999/08/19 Message-ID: <7ph5mv$uuk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 514681896 References: <7pefco$v7o$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37BBA5E1.13FBF70E@kvaerner.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x30.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Aug 19 14:52:21 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-08-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <37BBA5E1.13FBF70E@kvaerner.com>, "Tarjei T. Jensen" wrote: > Keith Thompson wrote: > > I'm well aware that there's little or no chance of this being added to > > some future version of Ada (which makes this whole thread somewhat > > off-topic, I suppose). I'm just saying that I like the idea, and I > > wouldn't mind seeing it in some future language. > > So would I. I don't care much for [+-*/]= as I too think it is ugly. > However using @ or a functional equivalent seems to be worthwhile. It > may make some code much more readable than it would otherwise be. I I personally don't agree that swapping perfectly good identifiers for line noise characters will make things more readable. But if you do feel that way, it would be trivial to implement it in a precompiler. -- T.E.D. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.