From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,10444cff97404845 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: C like op= proposal Date: 1999/08/19 Message-ID: <7pg9pr$aih$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 514547362 References: <37B7D172.DCE02FFA@Maths.UniNe.CH> <87emh2l218.fsf@antinea.enst.fr> <7pd6th$2qj$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7pecjk$std$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x36.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Aug 19 06:55:58 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-08-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Brian Rogoff wrote: > On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Robert Dewar wrote: > > The pseudo-variable proposal seems entirely horrible to me, and > > indeed was not discussed at all. I can see all kinds of abuse > > and very little gain from this syntactic vinegar :-) > > ROTFL! > > That little expression (syntactic vinegar) was the high point of a bland > day. Is that an original Dewarism? no, no, that's as old as programming languages as far as I know, certainly it dates back to the 60's .. :-) but i appreciate the ROTFL, anything to brighten up an otherwise dull day! Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.