From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,10444cff97404845
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "John Duncan" <jddst19+@pitt.edu>
Subject: Re: C like op= proposal
Date: 1999/08/17
Message-ID: <7papqs$8if$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 513667522
References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908151023060.10801-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <m3d7wosq6h.fsf@vault84.infomatch.bc.ca>
 <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908152124300.7953-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <37B7D172.DCE02FFA@Maths.UniNe.CH>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Organization: University of Pittsburgh
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-08-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>   a(b(c,d+e(f,g)).h(i,j)) :=   a(b(c,d+e(f,g)).h(i,j)) + 1;

1. Who is writing this code?
2. Is this code being looped through so many times that the optimization is
going to cause a significant decrease on execution times?
3. For whom is the ++ solution optimal?

-John