From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2308afbbe4ecec0b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Subverting 'Access for Sub-programs Date: 1999/08/11 Message-ID: <7osa3c$gb1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 511487654 References: <37A71EF1.2201@dera.gov.uk> <37A7FDE8.4F5@dera.gov.uk> <7o9vrv$qgt$1@wanadoo.fr> <7oc5ih$6mb$1@wanadoo.fr> <7oejga$28i$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37AEF7BF.7BBC8E06@averstar.com> <7oqahu$3s0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x38.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Aug 11 16:58:27 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-08-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Robert A Duff wrote: > Robert Dewar writes: > > > Yes, this would be annoying for the display folks, because, just > > as is necessary in Pascal if you use displays, you need to save > > the display as part of a subprogram access value. THis is not > ^^^ > > possible, but it is probably not the right approach. > ^^^^^^^^ > I think that's a typo -- you meant "not IMpossible" = "possible"? Indeed, thanks for pointing this out, I did indeed mean not impossible. Consider this to be an AI reintepreting my original message to say impossible instead of possible :-) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.