From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ee2d0c749295630e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Richard D Riehle <laoXhai@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Ada/ Career Position/ Exceptional Opportunity
Date: 1999/08/10
Message-ID: <7oo1sr$rf@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 510890500
References: <7omctt$jqo$0@192.153.35.30> <37AEE768.8C7C0A9B@pwfl.com>
 <37AF6504.A959B615@apci.net>
Organization: Netcom
X-NETCOM-Date: Mon Aug 09  9:13:47 PM CDT 1999
X-Inktomi-Trace: sji-ca-cache 934251202 5936 205.186.214.167 (10 Aug 1999
 02:13:22 GMT)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-08-09T21:13:47-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <37AF6504.A959B615@apci.net>,
	"David F. Harrison" <dfh@apci.net> wrote:

>Marin David Condic wrote:
>> 
>....> Ft. Wayne, IN? That's got to be Magnavox. I've been to Indiana & I
>think
>> Florida is a bit warmer - at least in winter. ...
>
>There are worse things than cold.  (Aligators come to mind.  8-)

Which reminds me of an Ada class I was teaching at a Navy base.  We
came to the subject of access types.  As I began to discuss dynamic
allocation, one of the civilian employees of the Navy in the back of
the room raised his hand and asked, "Richard, does this mean we are
going to be up to our access types in allocators?"

Richard Riehle
richard@adaworks.com
http://www.adaworks.com