From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2308afbbe4ecec0b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Subverting 'Access for Sub-programs
Date: 1999/08/05
Message-ID: <7ocqru$rrm$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 509286274
References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908042121260.29130-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <Yq9q3.349$cb1.79221@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x41.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Aug 05 20:06:31 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-08-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <Yq9q3.349$cb1.79221@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net>,
  tmoran@bix.com wrote:
> > if you could extend the tagged type at a deeper
accessibility level
> It is a real annoyance that tagged types require so much to be
> moved from its natural place out to library level.  IMHO


But it is pretty fundamental and obvious that a tagged type
cannot be extended in a temporary inner scope, no? what are
you suggesting here?

If you are just saying, "I don't like this restriction" fine,
but not particularly constructive :-)


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.