From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4024aa5f74aaba1c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-05 00:37:24 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!elnk-pas-nf1!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!attbi_s01.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Letters
References: <7_6Kb.31385$x34.9686@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <7n9Kb.738066$HS4.5654620@attbi_s01>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.161.24.134
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-Trace: attbi_s01 1073291843 67.161.24.134 (Mon, 05 Jan 2004 08:37:23 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 08:37:23 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 08:37:23 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4114
Date: 2004-01-05T08:37:23+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>Scientific American ... there wasn't an issue that would go by
  When I was in high school I recall cataloging all my copies.  The
great preponderance of articles were biochemistry.  But perhaps that
was before your time.  OTOH, the "100 years ago" items sound more like
today's content.
  I wonder how many readers migrated to Science or Nature.
Back (somewhat) on topic: is CACM no longer a reviewed publication?
It was, once, IIRC.