From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3dbf2f325f33ce35
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Elimination of "use" clauses
Date: 1999/07/21
Message-ID: <7n5chh$864$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 503667362
References: <377B5807.88B875E0@cs.york.ac.uk> <7lh74s$v36$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7ligdq$c8q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7ljb4e$na9$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7ltus1$ah1@dfw-ixnews19.ix.netcom.com> <wccr9mc5y47.fsf@world.std.com>
 <7mrjus$bet@dfw-ixnews14.ix.netcom.com> <dale-1807991510420001@192.168.0.2>
 <7n0icj$1je@dfw-ixnews21.ix.netcom.com>
 <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907191951470.25136-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <7n0ska$h20$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907201840120.500-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <7n4r4e$5p$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x39.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Jul 21 21:02:50 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-07-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7n4r4e$5p$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote:
>       Foo FooBar.= Bar

Yech! this is even worse than the prefix notation if you ask
me. I very much doubt that this construction (which is by the
way syntactically dubious) would satisfy those people for whom
use type is a welcome way out of renaming or using prefix
notation.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.