From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2485cb1936a0a4ec
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Package with initialization only
Date: 1999/07/21
Message-ID: <7n57tf$60q$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 503637094
References: <37961DD6.E56BD3E9@maths.unine.ch>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x32.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Jul 21 19:43:46 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 1999-07-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <37961DD6.E56BD3E9@maths.unine.ch>,
  Gautier <gautier.demontmollin@maths.unine.ch> wrote:
> A small "aesthetic" problem: I have a package with initialization
only;
> thus I must add a dummy procedure to resolve the with/without body
> ambiguity Ada95 doesn't accept. There is surely a more elegant
formulation,

Well, perhaps it would be more pleasing if you renamed your dummy
routine "Initialize" and moved all the initialization code into it. If
you put it into the public part that would even allow others to
reinitialize the variable.

--
T.E.D.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.