From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3dbf2f325f33ce35 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: Elimination of "use" clauses Date: 1999/07/21 Message-ID: <7n4r4e$5p$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 503557541 References: <377B5807.88B875E0@cs.york.ac.uk> <7lh74s$v36$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7ligdq$c8q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7ljb4e$na9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7ltus1$ah1@dfw-ixnews19.ix.netcom.com> <7mrjus$bet@dfw-ixnews14.ix.netcom.com> <7n0icj$1je@dfw-ixnews21.ix.netcom.com> <7n0ska$h20$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x39.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Jul 21 16:05:45 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-07-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Brian Rogoff wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Robert Dewar wrote: > spec problem. I find the idea of "special casing" the operators inelegant; > if anything I'd prefer that operators and functions were more alike and > that one could define new infix operators. But they are *already* a special case, which is the source of the problem. Unline nomal functions, the infix operators can no longer be used in their expected manner (infix) when they are not directly visible. If the following worked: with FooBar; ... Foo FooBar.= Bar ...then perhaps we wouldn't be having this discussion. -- T.E.D. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.