From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,92c39a3be0a7f17d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-02 03:52:06 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.mathworks.com!intgwlon.nntp.telstra.net!news1.optus.net.au!optus!spool01.syd.optusnet.com.au!spool.optusnet.com.au!210.49.20.122.MISMATCH!not-for-mail From: IsraelRT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Future with Ada Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 11:19:16 +1100 Organization: nowhere in particular Message-ID: <7msi0uo9uqdr0jbqvel20bvdf9t31lrfbt@4ax.com> References: <3wdH7.20135$xS6.32614@www.newsranger.com> <9tqete0gqc@drn.newsguy.com> <3C0924D6.2B5A3087@adaworks.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.164.144.6 X-Trace: 1007252890 7489 203.164.144.6 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17301 Date: 2001-12-02T11:19:16+11:00 List-Id: On Sat, 01 Dec 2001 10:43:35 -0800, Richard Riehle wrote: >In those same organizations, many programmers don't want to program in Ada >because they see few commercial opportunities for that skill. These programmers >don't care whether Ada is a better language. They care about the future of their >career. The companies don't care whether Ada is superior to C++. They >often admit it is. They do care about being able to hire people who want to >program in Ada. The same could be said of Smalltalk, Ocaml, Haskell and any other low-marketshare language. That is the problem with niche languages. Live with it ( and the satisfaction of using a superior language ) or use something more mainstream...