From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9d0b383ee17c13af
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: One type for all
Date: 1999/07/17
Message-ID: <7mqueq$k7e$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 502195097
References: <3783E0D2.5D74243@boeing.com> <3786741C.E73F1124@hso.link.com>
 <7mdobd$fu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <1999Jul12.193436.1@eisner>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x37.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 208.224.78.140
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Jul 17 22:01:02 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-07-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1999Jul12.193436.1@eisner>,
  Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam wrote:
> Obviously "vacation" is not one of Robert's core
> competencies... :-)

Well I am not sure I get that joke, but I am a little surprised
that no one has chimed in here to give the exact Pascal rules
from the standard (either one :-)

The one reply was about anonymous types, which is really quite
a different issue than the basic issue of whether a language
uses structural or named type equivalence.

Robert Dewar


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.