From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,865e31ac5a1b553a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: where is the faq
Date: 1999/07/17
Message-ID: <7mqtdv$jtc$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 502191109
References: <7mneah$g5j$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <DJJj3.291$Yp6.13826@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x37.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 208.224.78.140
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Jul 17 21:43:28 1999 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-07-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <DJJj3.291$Yp6.13826@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net>,
  tmoran@bix.com wrote:
> >> Failing that, what is the best Win NT compiler?
> >
> >That depends on what your critera are.
>   Note also that Aonix (among others) gives you a complete
walk-back
> in ada.exceptions.exception_information and also in case of an
> unhandled exception.  With Gnat you'll get "Constraint Error"
or such
> as your only clue about where the problem might lie.  So,
unless you
> write perfect code every time, the first time, you'll *always*
need
> to run Gnat exe's under the debugger.  If you want similar
failure
> information if your program dies on a customer, you'll have to
tell
> him to run your program only under the debugger.

This is out of date information. The latest version of GNAT
for NT can give full traceback information if you use zero
cost exception handling.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.