From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,865e31ac5a1b553a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: where is the faq Date: 1999/07/16 Message-ID: <7mneah$g5j$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 501727694 References: <140719991226209634%rsutc@twu.ca> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x33.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Jul 16 14:07:21 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-07-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <140719991226209634%rsutc@twu.ca>, rsutc@twu.ca wrote: > Failing that, what is the best Win NT compiler? That depends on what your critera are. Gnat is good if you want to compile large programs and want to spend as little as possible. Its also a good choice if you want to use other tools in the gnu toolchain, or if you are used to a Unix command-line interface and prefer working that way. Gnat is the *only* choice if you want annex E support. The Aonix compiler is a good choice if you don't need to compile large programs, or you don't mind paying for the compiler. (If you need support, it may even be *cheaper* than Gnat w/ support) Its also a good choice if you want to link with MS Visual C++ object files, or if you prefer a Visual-style IDE. It also has a win32 GUI-builder, if I recall correctly. -- T.E.D. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.