From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8660fe29f138b478 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: Freezing question Date: 1999/07/16 Message-ID: <7mnc3q$f6r$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 501716896 References: <7mlg18$qk0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <378E57FE.FA7EEB99@averstar.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x30.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Jul 16 13:29:45 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-07-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <378E57FE.FA7EEB99@averstar.com>, Tucker Taft wrote: > Ted Dennison wrote: > > type Fruit is abstract tagged private; > > type Apple is abstract new Fruit with private; > I suppose another problem is that, for a private extension, the > set of inherited operations is determined by those of the ancestor > at the point where the private extension is declared. Ahhh. I bet that's it. Does that mean that in the example above, Apple will inherit *none* of Fruit's operations, since none of them were declared before Apple? -- T.E.D. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.