From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,16a35419d117fb15
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: discriminant
Date: 1999/07/13
Message-ID: <7mfot4$n2v$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 500545485
References: <3789bfc2.97977684@news.dsuper.net>
 <rracine.21.0008309A@draper.com> <378c1097.184220259@news.dsuper.net>
 <rracine.22.000F0325@draper.com> <378a9c0e.2792962@news.dsuper.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x23.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Jul 13 16:18:58 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 1999-07-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <378a9c0e.2792962@news.dsuper.net>,
  fluffy_puff@dsuper.net wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 1999 20:00:38 GMT, rracine@draper.com (Roger Racine)
> wrote:

> Is there a significant difference between GNAT and Aonix in the number
> of bugs they have ?  I recently dowloaded GNAT but haven't used it
> yet.  I noticed it's quite a bit smaller than the Aonix package, but

Not a *significant* difference. But there do seem (to me) to be less,
and the ones that are there are *different* bugs.

--
T.E.D.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.