From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,910c51d316d0d640
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Freeing a dynamically allocated object
Date: 1999/07/08
Message-ID: <7m2bpu$cbn$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 498565945
References: <7m2b39$bvu$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x38.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jul 08 14:15:39 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 1999-07-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7m2b39$bvu$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  okellogg@my-deja.com wrote:
> What's the best way to deallocate a dynamically
> allocated object (i.e. of an access-to-tagged type) ?
> In good old Ada83, one would instantiate
> the generic Unchecked_Deallocation package.
> A C++ colleague of mine was asking me, where's
> the "delete" in Ada95 ?

That's it.

--
T.E.D.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.