From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,42b8b2c27439b7d0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: obsolete ascii? (for language lawyers) Date: 1999/07/02 Message-ID: <7liiip$d61$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 496415935 References: <7las7v$5p0$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <7lhqs9$9c$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <7lih9i$ckb$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x27.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Jul 02 14:32:57 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-07-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7lih9i$ckb$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Ted Dennison wrote: > characters. Is it just that "Characters.Latin_1.BEL" takes up more > package ASCII renames Characters.Latin_1; Yikes! Make both those "Ada.Characters.Latin_1". -- T.E.D. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.