From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2080eb40d5b08371,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Joe Wisniewski Subject: Ada Skill Assessments Date: 1999/07/01 Message-ID: <7lgb74$kob$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 496083327 X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x37.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 192.91.146.35 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jul 01 18:15:13 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (WinNT; U) Date: 1999-07-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Has there been any serious discussions of this issue as it relates to Ada skill assessments? (I'll answer my own question :--) ) Among the last several "Ada clients" for which I have done work, I am seeing, in general, a degradation of skilled Ada talent. Now, upon closer analysis, the "actual" skills that I am seeing "lacking" may or may not be due to one or more of the following: over-influx of "young talent" (Refer to previous posts on c.l.a. wrt "Looking for Jr. Ada people") general lack of engineering skills lack of OO training/experience lack of _effective_ Ada training/experience (I emphasize _effective_ because I am seeing many organizations going to these 1 or 2 day internal Ada training classes and claiming their engineers are now "Ada proficient".) Since the amount of available Ada work FAR exceeds the available skilled Ada talent, is it not now the time for ACM/SigAda or some association of vendors/clients/headhunters related to Ada talent to come up with an assessment. Feasibility? Need? Want? Thoughts? Something to have a "Birds of a Feather" meeting in Redondo on? Joe Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.