From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3dbf2f325f33ce35 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Joe Wisniewski Subject: Re: Elimination of "use" clauses Date: 1999/07/01 Message-ID: <7lfqrc$dl6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 495997944 References: <377B5807.88B875E0@cs.york.ac.uk> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x29.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 192.91.146.34 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jul 01 13:35:41 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (WinNT; U) Date: 1999-07-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: I don't know of any tools out there that do this. Using ASIS, for detection of these occurrences would appear to be the way to go. Then obviously a source modification response. What platform? Which compiler and compiler vendor? If you don't find a tool this is something that I might like to take a crack at. Joe In article <377B5807.88B875E0@cs.york.ac.uk>, Neil.Audsley@cs.york.ac.uk wrote: > > We have a lot of Ada source that "with"s and "use"s a lot of packages -- > to the extent that it is difficult and time-consuming to find out which > package a procedure is actually from. > Ideally, we would like to eliminate "use" clauses, necessitating the > replacement of each procedure call X by PackageName.X instead. > Is there a tool that does this? > > -- > ======================================================================== = > Dr. Neil C. Audsley Email: neil@cs.york.ac.uk > Senior Research Fellow Phone: +44-1904-432787 > Department of Computer Science, Fax: +44-1904-432708 > University of York, > York. Y01 5DD, UK > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.