From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d10596e187e90822
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Private Children
Date: 1999/06/25
Message-ID: <7l025t$4os$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 493761139
References: <m3bteacxb8.fsf@mheaney.ni.net> <7klja3$c0p$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x37.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Jun 25 14:02:46 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-06-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7klja3$c0p$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote:
> In article <m3bteacxb8.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>,
>   Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org> wrote:
> > Can a public child package with its private sibling?
> >
>
> Almost exactly one month ago, I posted the exact same
> question. Go to deja.com and search for a thread titled
> "Children of private nhcompilation units" to see the
> discussion.

If you go there you will find out that it is a totally
unrelated issue, not at all "the exact same question".


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.