From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,eb16c447b2139225 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: Rational APEX Ada95 w/ X11R6 Date: 1999/06/16 Message-ID: <7k8rce$sf7$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 490337414 References: <929466176.893.35@news.remarQ.com> <7k6cr9$qk$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7k8f6m$mta$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x23.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Jun 16 18:45:38 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-06-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Matthew Heaney wrote: > On 16 Jun 1999 15:17, dennison@telepath.com wrote: > > > > No. All the C calls to X/Motif can be done by a thin C layer, called > > > > In which case you would instead need bindings to the "thin C layer"... > > Yes, but that number is small compared to the number of X calls in a > typical X client. If you are doing X-level programming, perhaps. You can achieve the same end with Motif by using UIL to specify the initial configuration of all your windows. Then there's only a very small number of X/Motif calls you need to make. If I remember correctly, you need a couple of Xt calls (Initialize the application, main event loop), three MRM calls (initialize, load the hierarchy from disk, get a handle for a given widget name), and one MRM call for each widget-manipulation routine you use. Its actually small enough where its hardly worth even buying bindings. You can just write them as you need them. -- T.E.D. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.